Most Popular

June 19, 2014

NPR Poll in Senate Battleground...

These 12 battleground U.S. Senate races take place in a country deeply discontented with the state of the country, all national leaders, and political...
July 31, 2014

An Idea Whose Time Has Come

  Battling big money in the Senate battleground with real consequences for 2014 A new poll of the 12 states where control of the Senate is...
June 25, 2014

Women's Economic Agenda: Powerful...

This is a turning point in the 2014 off-year elections when parties, candidates, and leaders can recognize how central are unmarried women and the...

The Election, Economy, and Policy Implications
Friday, November 09 2012
Attachments:
Download this file (dcor.ecnpe.fq.110812.pdf)Frequency Questionnaire[ ]175 Kb
Download this file (dcor.ecnpe.graphs.110912.v10.pdf)Graphs[ ]1475 Kb
Download this file (dcor.ecnpe.targets.110712.pdf)Crosstabs[ ]274 Kb

These observations about the economy and election are based primarily on a new election night survey conducted for the Economy Media Project — conducted the nights of November 6th and 7th — with 800 voters.  This is a unique survey that explores why people voted the way they did, the impact of the economy, and the policy implications.

  • The public mood on the macro economy, personal finances, and the job market all ticked up just before Election Day, but basic indicators of personal financial circumstances have not improved and remain tough for people.
  • Those who either voted for or considered voting for Obama did so first because of his economic actions — getting through the crisis—but also his future plans, including getting the rich to pay more.  They also supported him because of the Affordable Care Act and Medicare, as well as his support for women and minorities.
  • The vote against Romney was single-minded: Romney was for the rich and out of touch with the middle class, re-enforced by the 47 Percent and Bain Capital.
  • This was a battle for the future of the middle class and Obama won that war.
  • If the mandate is to address the middle class, step one is getting the economy moving, more than deficit reduction, and protecting retirement programs.
  • Voters trust Obama on Medicare and believe Medicare and Social Security cuts should not be part of a deficit deal.   Two-thirds want a tax increase to be included in any budget deal. Most would cancel or postpone the sequester.
  • Economists and progressives should argue against drastic spending cuts and make the case for serious long-term investment that will also help reduce the deficit.  A majority now support that position against austerity.
  • There is no progressive headwind in the area of economics: voters are drawn mostly to higher taxes for high income earners and to public investment.
  • But voters do not yet know the progressive economic plan.  Only 44 percent of voters said Obama was better on jobs — 5 points behind Romney.  And there is only modest support for short-term policies, except for school modernization and more teachers.  What they do support are bold long-term policies — tested here for the first time.