Most Popular

April 21, 2017

TIME: Women Trump Voters Are...

By Stan Greenberg and Page Gardner  President Donald Trump won the 2016 election partly because many Americans believed that a businessman not...
April 05, 2017

Moving to scale to win on health...

The humiliating retreat of President Trump and Speaker Ryan on the Obamacare replacement was a powerful moment for working class women, financially...
March 01, 2017

Trump's address increases optimism...

The president began the night with a majority disapproving of his performance, and he ended with a majority feeling more optimistic about him. The...

Republicans Enter Wall Street Reform Debate Weighed Down by Luntz Memo
Thursday, April 22 2010

Tags: democracy corps | Democrats | Luntz | obama | Republican Party | senate

Attachments:
Access this URL (http://www.democracycorps.com/wp-content/files/dcor042010fq4.finreg.pdf)Frequency Questionnaire[ ]45 Kb
Access this URL (http://www.democracycorps.com/wp-content/files/dcor04222010.financialreform.FINAL_.pdf)Memo[ ]58 Kb

Republicans in the Senate decided to base their opposition to financial reform using a message developed by GOP pollster Frank Luntz, arguing that reform amounts to bailouts for Wall Street banks. But our polling reveals this to be the weakest argument available to Republicans. This approach is 8 to 11 points weaker than the other messages against reform and 35 to 40 points worse than arguments in favor of it.

This Republican anti-reform message as framed by Luntz and parroted by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell - that reform provides for an institutionalized taxpayer bailout for Wall Street - falls completely flat.  The latest Democracy Corps poll finds only 27 percent saying that hearing such a message would make them much less or somewhat less likely to support a reform bill.  More voters, 46 percent, actually say this argument would make them more likely to support the Democrats' reform bill, not less. And the Luntz message fails to win support even among the Republican base. Republicans would have been better off supporting President Obama's financial reforms and working with him on economic growth strategies.